Potentially my ideal (or perhaps worst) feature is that I'm permanently disappointed with my own knowledge.

This could be why I've shown a certain ability for mathematics and physics. Simply recognizing is never sufficient for me; I have to minimum aim to rigorously comprehend the reasoning behind the mathematics I do, and after that, take my expertise to its restrictions. Profusely asking about the reason something is the way it is, maybe to the aggravation of my lecturers, is something I'm obliged to do. I, as well as numerous others, find this Socratic technique of understanding and also teaching to be unbelievably beneficial in developing a fundamental understanding of maths and physics from standard concepts, and I endeavour to inform in precisely this fashion.

I hope I can imbue trainees with my extreme love of maths and physics or, at the minimum, disclose the topics as far less complicated than they show up. Normally not every person is a mathematician, and different minds find out at various speeds, however I will aim to leave an enduring and valuable impact.